AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs 4800+: Overclock King? , Article , pcper << Back << Home

Processors: AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs 4800+: Overclock King?

Home
 
° FAQs
° Blog
° Mailing List
° Contact Us

Reviews Directory
° Advanced Search
° Latest Links Added
° Popular Reviews
° Random Review
° Add a Review
Make Home
 
..
   
 

 

Home : Processors : AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs 4800+: Overclock King? (Detail, Article )  
 
Find a review or article:

Advanced search
Random link



AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs 4800+: Overclock King? : Article

Added to the directory: Wed, 28 Dec, 2005. Source: pcper.

Quote: Unfortunately, unlike the AMD of old, the X2 processors don't have the one luxury that older Athlon branded processors had that led many enthusiasts to them: low prices compared to the competition. Currently, the top dual-core Athlon X2 processor is the 4800+ model that can be found for sale on a typical range of $787-850. The 400 MHz clock differential between the 3800+ and the 4800+ is really the one facet of the cores that will make a significant difference in performance. The smaller L2 caches on the 3800+ do affect performance, but on a much more minute level. But 400 MHz can mean a lot when it comes to gaming and media applications. What is a new system builder or upgrader to do then? After hearing lots of good stories about the ease of overclocking the 3800+, I pulled out the worn-in credit card and had one sent over. So the challenge would be: could I EASILY get the 3800+ processor to perform as well or better than the nearly $800 4800+ processor?

Visit this link [ 67 click(s) ]
Search for related links in: the directory or the forums.


[Previous link in the category] [Next link in the category]

Find more reviews and articles in our categories:

----------
You are currently on ReviewsHQ.com. Each day, Reviewshq.com browses the best computer hardware web sites to inform you about the newly published reviews, previews and articles.
Go back to the frontpage of the site.


ReviewsHQ.com button, add it to your site.

Copyright © 2003-2005 - ReviewsHQ.com -
Articles are the property of their respective owner.
ReviewsHQ.com is not responsible for the content it refers to,
and cannot be held responsible for any damage resulting from the use of this content.
- Privacy -