AMD Athlon 64 3200 , VIA K8T800, nForce3 150 , Review , Hexus << Back << Home

Motherboards: Chipset: AMD Athlon 64 3200 , VIA K8T800, nForce3 150

Home
 
° FAQs
° Blog
° Mailing List
° Contact Us

Reviews Directory
° Advanced Search
° Latest Links Added
° Popular Reviews
° Random Review
° Add a Review
Make Home
 
..
   
 

 

Home : Motherboards : Chipset : AMD Athlon 64 3200 , VIA K8T800, nForce3 150 (Detail, Review )  
 
Find a review or article:

Advanced search
Random link



AMD Athlon 64 3200 , VIA K8T800, nForce3 150 : Review

Added to the directory: Mon, 06 Oct, 2003. Source: Hexus.

Quote: Yet hope is very much at hand. The media circus has been circulating around the 940-pin dual memory channel AMD64 FX-51 CPU. AMD, in its wisdom, has not positioned the FX-xx line as the natural successor to the consumer-level Barton CPU. No, that job is left for another 32/64-bit hybrid that takes many of the qualities from the Opteron / FX and amalgamates them into a package that's sure to whet the appetites of enthusiasts and power freaks on a relative budget. If the FX-51 is the Sledgehammer, the 754-pin variety is the Clawhammer. The major difference lies in the way the memory controller communicates with the DRAM. You see, while the Sledgehammer uses dual 64-bit channels linked up to ECC RAM, the Clawhammer forgoes a channel and makes use of regular unbuffered DRAM. Less bandwidth but more DRAM compatibility, it seems. Let's try to get to the bottom of the confusing Hammer family.

Visit this link [ 115 click(s) ]
Search for related links in: the directory or the forums.


[Previous link in the category] [Next link in the category]

Find more reviews and articles in our categories:

----------
You are currently on ReviewsHQ.com. Each day, Reviewshq.com browses the best computer hardware web sites to inform you about the newly published reviews, previews and articles.
Go back to the frontpage of the site.


ReviewsHQ.com button, add it to your site.

Copyright © 2003-2005 - ReviewsHQ.com -
Articles are the property of their respective owner.
ReviewsHQ.com is not responsible for the content it refers to,
and cannot be held responsible for any damage resulting from the use of this content.
- Privacy -